Enter Keyword and Search





HRA to PBOR as per 7th Pay Commission

HRA to PBOR as per 7th Pay Commission
PBORs have the option to choose CILQ or HRA, whichever is more beneficial.

PBORs of uniformed forces have vehemently argued for doing away with the concept of Authorized Married Establishment and the requirement of a minimum age of 25 years for grant of Compensation in Lieu of Quarters (CILQ).

For a certain number of PBORs, there is an option to choose between HRA and Compensation in lieu of Quarters (CILQ). For the remaining, compensation for housing is provided through Family Accommodation Allowance (FAA), and for certain ranks, through Single in Lieu of Quarters (SNLQ).

CILQ: The service conditions of the Defence Forces personnel demand that personnel reside in cantonments close to their Units. The entitlement of accommodation, therefore, forms a part of service conditions. Keeping in view functional requirements, an authorization of married establishment (by way of a specified percentage of the total establishment) has been decided by the government. PBORs who fall within this authorization percentage and cannot be provided married accommodation are entitled to Compensation in lieu of quarters (CILQ). CILQ is a composite allowance, meant to compensate for hiring of house, furniture, electricity and water etc. It is payable to PBORs who are married and are >=25 years of age. PBORs have the option to choose CILQ or HRA, whichever is more beneficial. This allowance is also applicable to similarly placed personnel of CAPFs and Indian Coast Guard. CILQ is payable at the following rates:

For the balance, compensation is through the FAA, which was introduced by the VI CPC. It is payable at the lowest rate of HRA to all PBORs of Defence services, CAPFs and India Coast Guard who do not qualify for benefit of HRA or CILQ. In Ministry of Defence, it is granted at the rate of 10 percent of Basic Pay, while in Ministry of Home, it is granted at a flat rate of ₹1,050 pm.

SNLQ is applicable to JCOs and equivalent personnel of Defence Forces only. When not provided with any type of accommodation at the Duty Station, they are entitled to SNLQ which is equal to 2/3rd the rate of CILQ at that station, for their personal requirement, plus CILQ for their families at the rate of a Class ‘Z’ city.

The present provisions can be understood with a simple example. Suppose for a particular rank, the provision of Authorized Married Establishment (AME) is 50 percent and there are, say, 100 such personnel at that place. Then first 50 personnel can choose whether to opt for HRA or take CILQ. The remaining 50 personnel are entitled only to FAA. When posted in Field areas, PBORs of Defence forces are entitled to HRA for their families at Selected Place of Residence (SPR). However, no such provision is available in CAPFs or Coast Guard.

There is a strong demand from PBORs of CAPFs and Coast Guard for being extended a similar benefit.

Analysis and Recommendations of 7th Pay Commission:
There is no doubt that personnel of uniformed services are unique in several ways. They are required to stay in the field for long periods of time, away from families. Even in non-field stations (peace stations), a minimum strength is required to be maintained in the barracks for quick deployment at short notice.

It is noted by the Commission that there was a time when these personnel could leave their families behind in villages and go for field postings. However, times have changed. Many of these PBORs have working spouses and harbor legitimate expectations of raising their children in urban areas.

With the AME percentage being limited, personnel take turns to fit into the AME percentage. An employee who is married but is less than 25 years of age is not entitled for AME at all, and therefore cannot avail CILQ. In the current context the provisions of AME as well as the stipulation of minimum 25 years of age to occupy these establishments are outdated and need revisiting.

It is felt that the service rendered by PBORs of uniformed services needs to be recognized and their housing provisions simplified. The Commission, in the interactions it has had with the men on the ground at all field locations it has visited, has seen firsthand that the lack of proper housing compensation is a source of discontentment among these employees. Hence, the following structure is recommended:

An employee with dependents, during field posting or staying in Barracks as functional requirement will be eligible for accommodation for his dependents anywhere in the country. * Provided government accommodation is not available for the dependents at Selected Place of Residence. If government accommodation is available, no HRA is payable.

** Reduced HRA means rate of HRA applicable reduced by 5 percent. However, the reduced amount cannot be less than the lowest rate of HRA applicable to Class Z cities/towns. Allowance is available provided employee is required to stay in barracks as a functional requirement and government accommodation is not available for the dependents at Selected Place of Residence. If employee is staying in barracks by choice or government accommodation is available at Selected Place of Residence, no HRA is payable.

@ Reduced HRA means rate of HRA applicable reduced by 5%. However, the reduced amount cannot be less than the lowest rate of HRA applicable to Class Z cities/towns. Allowance is available provided employee is required to stay in Barracks as a functional requirement. If employee is staying in Barracks by choice, no HRA is payable. # Provided government accommodation is not available, else no HRA is payable.

Staying in barracks cannot be equated with provision of adequate housing. Hence, some compensation is provided for those personnel who are required to stay in barracks as a functional requirement in the form of Reduced HRA. The restrictions related to Authorized Married Establishment, 25 years of age as well as the concept of Separated Family Accommodation should be done away with. CILQ, FAA and SNLQ should also be abolished.

Authority: 7th CPC Report

0 comments:



Our Most Visited & Commented Posts

FAST TRACK COMMITTEE - Mainly for MCM
154 Comments - 10,982 Views

INJUSTICE FOR PHARMACISTS AND LAB TECHNICIAN…
31 Comments - 9,657 Views

Government Of India Notification About IME India Recognition
24 Comments - 40,061 Views

Expected DA (Dearness Allowance) for CG Employees from July 2009 is 27%
22 Comments - 33,048 Views

ACP vs MACP
31 Comments - 30,025 Views

MACP SCHEME FOR CG CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES
10 Comments - 38,803 Views

Revised rates of subscription under CGHS due to revision of pay and allowance
0 Comments - 47,146 Views

CHILDREN EDUCATION ALLOWANCE SCHEME – Need For a Clarification
49 Comments - 56,292 Views

SCHEME FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
29 Comments - 50,163 Views

Pay Protection - Transfer under commpassionate ground
14 Comments - 26802 Views

Sixth CPC - Revision of pay scales - DoP&T Order
19 Comments - 66,033 Views

Travelling Allowance to Central Government servants on retirement
2 Comments - 29,767 Views

Revision in the rate of Ration Money Allowance in respect of Non-Gazetted RPF/RPSF personnel
2 Comments - 18,178 Views

New Income Tax slab for A.Y.2010-11, F.Y.2009-10
9 Comments - 23,675 Views

Air Travel on official account – both domestic and international
12 Comments - 19,682 Views

Revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners
0 Comments - 10,168 Views

Review of CGHS (Central Government Health Scheme)
7 Comments - 11,970 Views

Announcement of 60% arrears of 6th Pay Commission expected shortly
48 Comments - 13,238 Views

Journey by air while availing Leave Travel Concession - clarification regarding
10 Comments - 16,979 Views

The Increment date is July 1st for all Central Government Employees
26 Comments - 29,406 Views

MACP Scheme - PB-2 Grade Pay 4200 (5000 - 5500 - 6500) - Clarification
34 Comments - 61,461 Views

Pension allowable only on completion of 20 years in service: CAT
14 Comments - 4,493 Views

Raising retirement to 62
78 Comments - 60,502 Views

NEW TAX CODE Tax deduction limit on savings to be hiked to Rs 3 lakh
7 Comments - 18,987 Views

Authorised Medical Attendant - Chennai Doctors Name List
5 Comments - 10,445 Views

Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for Railway Employees
7 Comments - 17,049 Views

New Fee Structure in Kendriya Vidyalaya Schools
4 Comments - 18,823 Views

40 DAYS BONUS(PLB) FOR CIVILIANS EMPLOYEES
2 Comments - 12,623 Views

Cabinet has approved to issue 5% additional Dearness Allowance from 1.7.2009
18 Comments - 29,965 Views

Clarification reg. - Air Travel while availing LTC
12 Comments - 18,633 Views

NEW PENSION SCHEME
24 Comments - 75,851 Views

FR SR, Part III Central Civil Services - Leave Rules
11 Comments - 34,011 Views

Pay and promotional disparity in BSF compared to armed forces
20 Comments - 26,867 Views

Complete details are given of National Anomaly Committee Meeting and discussions in Confederation Website
61 Comments - 11,556 Views

Expected DA (Dearness Allowance) for Central Government Employees from Jan 2010 - 35%
75 Comments - 88,819 Views

http://90paisa.blogspot.com/2009/11/no.html
19 Comments - 17,594 Views

Govt cannot refuse NOC to employee on technical grounds: CAT
13 Comments - 21,226 Views

Recommendation of the Fast Track Committee regarding the pay scale of Pharmacists
30 Comments - 9,250 Views

MODIFIED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME (MACPS) - Clarifications
22 Comments - 22,914 Views

Pay Fixation on Promotion : Applicability of Minimum Pay / Stepping up of Pay clarification
22 Comments - 29,299 Views

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE HELD ON 12th DECEMBER, 2009
8 Comments - 13,678 Views

NEW PAY SCALE OF ORDNANCE FACTORY EMPLOYEES
3 Comments - 36,642 Views

Posting of husband and wife at the same station
33 Comments - 47,341 Views

Agenda Points for 46th Meeting of National Council (JCM) from BPMS
23 Comments - 11,674 Views

CGEGIS - Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the period from 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010.
0 Comments - 21,788 Views

Child Care Leave - Clarification from PC of A(Fys) Kolkata
12 Comments - 41,810 Views

Rule 21A of Income Tax Rules 1962 - Form 10E
5 Comments - 14,465 Views

Grant of the pay structure of grade pay of Rs.4600 in the pay band PB-2 to Assistants of Central Secretairiat Service
2 Comments - 13,264 Views

Engagement of retired employees on daily remuneration basis
0 Comments - 16,974 Views

GRANT OF 3rd FINANCIAL UPGRADATION TO STENOGRAPHERS - CLARIFICATION
4 Comments - 12,641 Views

Order to revise house rent rule
13 Comments - 16,210 Views

National Anomaly Committee Meeting Conclusions and Discussions
46 Comments - 69,084 Views

The 2nd National Anomaly Committee meeting - Decisions and Discussion
26 Comments - 48,386 Views

Model RRs for stenographer Grade II post in non-Secretariat Organizations
29 Comments - 15,566 Views

General Budget 2017-18 – NFIR’s proposals for consideration
0 Comments - 26,260 Views

Grant of Children Education allowance to third child when first / second child is not in a position to go to school due to severe disability
1 Comments - 23,057 Views

The Staff Side’s Suggestion on MACP’s Core Issue
4 Comments - 10,431 Views

Gratuity Act raises unions’ hackles
24 Comments - 8,213 Views

Fixed Medical Allowance for Pensioners - Staff Side demanded Rs.600 per month
2 Comments - 10,687 Views

http://90paisa.blogspot.com/2010/05/fixed-medical-allowance-for-pensioners.html
5 Comments - 10,684 Views

MACP JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING ON ANOMALIES
26 Comments - 29,666 Views

Features of MACPS (Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme)
15 Comments - 27,989 Views

National Council meeting Agenda and Discussion points from Confederation
1 Comments - 12,167 Views

Skill Test for recruitment to the post of LDCs and Stenographers
6 Comments - 18,501 Views

Recent Posts

Disclaimer:As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only. 90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.